Revelations 17 & 18
Great Tribulation is Imminent! (Click the photo)
Sunday, June 28, 2015
Courthouse or Railroad Station?
August 2, 2015 - Case Number 2014A4010400166: Indigent Defendant arrested for allegedly threatening the Richland County Judicial Center in Columbia, SC with destructive devices. The complainant was the Defendant's court appointed counsel, Joshua Koger, Jr. Court appointed counsel, William A. Hodge, who, since his appointment in September 2014, has taken no action in furtherance of the Defendant's case, practices regularly at the Richland County Judicial Center. Circuit Court Judge Clifton B. Newman is the presiding judge. (See "Clifton B. Newman", below.) Conflict of interest, or railroad? Choo - choooo! Visit The Babylonian Fall!
Clifton B. Newman: Illuminati in the Court!
Case Numbers I926374 & I926375: In September 2011, criminal Defendant, Glen K. LaConey, was arrested in Richland County, South Carolina and charged with Harassment, Second Degree, two counts. The two arrest warrants both alleged that LaConey had threatened the following 5th Circuit Court Judges in their official capacities: Joseph M. Strickland, James J. Barber, III, Alison Renee Lee, and Deandrea G. Benjamin. Both warrants contained virtually identical language.
In 2012, the 5th Circuit Court of General Sessions in Richland County, South Carolina, appointed private attorney, Mathias G. Chaplain, as legal counsel to represent LaConey, after the Public Defenders Office was disqualified due to a conflict of interest. (The Public Defenders Office is a division of the 5th Circuit Court.) Additionally, the 5th Circuit Solicitors Office was disqualified for the same reason, and the matter was referred to the Office of the State Attorney General. (The Office of the Clerk of Court also is a division of the 5th Circuit Court and should be disqualified from participating in the trial!) Subsequently, attorney Chaplain refused to represent LaConey, except to file a motion for discovery in January 2012. Chaplain voluntarily filed a motion to be relieved as counsel for LaConey in or about February 2013, citing irreconcilable differences. LaConey received no ruling on the motion.
In or about May 2014, LaConey was notified by Assistant South Carolina Attorney General, Ashley McMahan that the Court had appointed attorney Joshua Koger, Jr. as legal counsel for LaConey. Subsequent inquiry disclosed that attorney Koger actually had been appointed in March 2013 and failed to notify LaConey of the appointment. LaConey filed a complaint against Koger with the Office of the Disciplinary Counsel for alleged violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, which was later dismissed.
On or about June 31, 2014, attorney Koger informed LaConey that a jury trial was scheduled for July 7, 2014 and that he and LaConey needed to prepare for trial. Subsequently, Koger and LaConey did have irreconcilable differences, which culminated in Koger's motion to be relieved as counsel for LaConey. Additionally, Koger filed a complaint with law enforcement alleging that LaConey had threatened the Richland County Judicial Center with destructive devices by stating, "There are surprises for the Richland County Judicial Center anyway. And, I don't make threats, I make devices!". LaConey was arrested for the alleged threat and for allegedly harassing a Lori Pelzer. (Read the rebuttals at Lori Pelzer Commits Perjury in Court!)
During a hearing on Koger's motion, held before the Honorable Clifton B. Newman, in which LaConey, Koger and McMahan were present, the Court granted Koger's motion. [Judge Newman is assigned to the 3rd Circuit; however, he is presiding over this 5th Circuit matter without approval of and an Order issued by the South Carolina Supreme Court. Hmmmm.] Additionally, McMahan recommended a pretrial mental health evaluation of LaConey. Judge Newman concurred. Notwithstanding Judge Newman's stipulation with the pretrial mental health evaluation, Judge Newman declined to appoint substitute counsel to represent LaConey and ordered LaConey to defend himself pro se, with only court appointed, secondary counsel. Judge Newman reasoned that the Court had appointed two attorneys to represent LaConey previously; both of whom moved to be relieved. LaConey informed Judge Newman that both counsel were relieved due to circumstances beyond LaConey's control. Judge Newman advised LaConey that the jury trial would begin immediately, and he denied LaConey's motion for a continuance to prepare for trial. Judge Newman further advised LaConey that he was ultimately responsible for his own defense and that LaConey had sufficient time to prepare. LaConey informed Judge Newman that, in or about June 2012, he submitted a written request to the Court for trial to proceed. Judge Newman recommended that LaConey and the State settle the matter while he retired to his chambers. Faced with the prospect of proceeding to trial without primary counsel, and under duress, LaConey plead nolo contendere (no contest) to the charges of Harassment, Second Degree, two counts, which was accepted and entered by the Court.
On June 11, 2015, LaConey filed a Post Conviction Relief action, in the 5th Circuit Court, Case No. 2015CP4003441, to withdraw his pleas and to remand the case for trial. (In September 2014, the court appointed attorney William A. Hodge to represent LaConey for the Threatening and Harassment charges. As of August 14, 2015, Hodge has done nothing substantive in furtherance of the case. Additionally, in September 2014, LaConey filed a motion for speedy trial. Trial is scheduled for May 31, 2016. Visit The Prosecuting "Defense" Attorneys! and How Freemasons control the courts.
The law of Threatening the Use of Destructive Devices.
The Honorable Clifton B. Newman
P. O. Box 516
Kingstree, SC 29556-0516
Office: (843) 355-9321 Ext: 7301
Fax: (843) 355-1576
In 2012, the 5th Circuit Court of General Sessions in Richland County, South Carolina, appointed private attorney, Mathias G. Chaplain, as legal counsel to represent LaConey, after the Public Defenders Office was disqualified due to a conflict of interest. (The Public Defenders Office is a division of the 5th Circuit Court.) Additionally, the 5th Circuit Solicitors Office was disqualified for the same reason, and the matter was referred to the Office of the State Attorney General. (The Office of the Clerk of Court also is a division of the 5th Circuit Court and should be disqualified from participating in the trial!) Subsequently, attorney Chaplain refused to represent LaConey, except to file a motion for discovery in January 2012. Chaplain voluntarily filed a motion to be relieved as counsel for LaConey in or about February 2013, citing irreconcilable differences. LaConey received no ruling on the motion.
In or about May 2014, LaConey was notified by Assistant South Carolina Attorney General, Ashley McMahan that the Court had appointed attorney Joshua Koger, Jr. as legal counsel for LaConey. Subsequent inquiry disclosed that attorney Koger actually had been appointed in March 2013 and failed to notify LaConey of the appointment. LaConey filed a complaint against Koger with the Office of the Disciplinary Counsel for alleged violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, which was later dismissed.
On or about June 31, 2014, attorney Koger informed LaConey that a jury trial was scheduled for July 7, 2014 and that he and LaConey needed to prepare for trial. Subsequently, Koger and LaConey did have irreconcilable differences, which culminated in Koger's motion to be relieved as counsel for LaConey. Additionally, Koger filed a complaint with law enforcement alleging that LaConey had threatened the Richland County Judicial Center with destructive devices by stating, "There are surprises for the Richland County Judicial Center anyway. And, I don't make threats, I make devices!". LaConey was arrested for the alleged threat and for allegedly harassing a Lori Pelzer. (Read the rebuttals at Lori Pelzer Commits Perjury in Court!)
During a hearing on Koger's motion, held before the Honorable Clifton B. Newman, in which LaConey, Koger and McMahan were present, the Court granted Koger's motion. [Judge Newman is assigned to the 3rd Circuit; however, he is presiding over this 5th Circuit matter without approval of and an Order issued by the South Carolina Supreme Court. Hmmmm.] Additionally, McMahan recommended a pretrial mental health evaluation of LaConey. Judge Newman concurred. Notwithstanding Judge Newman's stipulation with the pretrial mental health evaluation, Judge Newman declined to appoint substitute counsel to represent LaConey and ordered LaConey to defend himself pro se, with only court appointed, secondary counsel. Judge Newman reasoned that the Court had appointed two attorneys to represent LaConey previously; both of whom moved to be relieved. LaConey informed Judge Newman that both counsel were relieved due to circumstances beyond LaConey's control. Judge Newman advised LaConey that the jury trial would begin immediately, and he denied LaConey's motion for a continuance to prepare for trial. Judge Newman further advised LaConey that he was ultimately responsible for his own defense and that LaConey had sufficient time to prepare. LaConey informed Judge Newman that, in or about June 2012, he submitted a written request to the Court for trial to proceed. Judge Newman recommended that LaConey and the State settle the matter while he retired to his chambers. Faced with the prospect of proceeding to trial without primary counsel, and under duress, LaConey plead nolo contendere (no contest) to the charges of Harassment, Second Degree, two counts, which was accepted and entered by the Court.
On June 11, 2015, LaConey filed a Post Conviction Relief action, in the 5th Circuit Court, Case No. 2015CP4003441, to withdraw his pleas and to remand the case for trial. (In September 2014, the court appointed attorney William A. Hodge to represent LaConey for the Threatening and Harassment charges. As of August 14, 2015, Hodge has done nothing substantive in furtherance of the case. Additionally, in September 2014, LaConey filed a motion for speedy trial. Trial is scheduled for May 31, 2016. Visit The Prosecuting "Defense" Attorneys! and How Freemasons control the courts.
The law of Threatening the Use of Destructive Devices.
The Honorable Clifton B. Newman
P. O. Box 516
Kingstree, SC 29556-0516
Office: (843) 355-9321 Ext: 7301
Fax: (843) 355-1576
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
Babylonian Court Justice!
Lori Pelzer, a.k.a Lori L. Washington, her brother, Xavier Troy Smith and their closely held company, Home Assist Real Estate, LLC, were sued and judgments were filed against them in the following cases. Amazingly, after the judgment creditors sought proceedings to enforce their judgments (supplementary proceedings), certain corrupt judges aided Pelzer and Smith in hiding her assets! Prepare for Shock and Awe!
State of South Carolina
County of Richland
Court of Common Pleas
In 2001, Lori Pelzer stole the identity of her great-aunt, Lynn G. Yacoubian, to acquire a Capital One credit card in the name of "Home Assist Real Estate, LLC", which Lori Pelzer used toward her beauty pageants, groceries, restaurants, haircuts, videos, cosmetic dentistry, and other personal sundries. Capital One declined to prosecute because Lori Pelzer paid the account.
In 2002, Lori Pelzer stole the identity of her great-aunt, Lynn G. Yacoubian, to acquire a 1992 Ford Excursion from Ronnie Burns Ford located in Chesnee, South Carolina. Ronnie Burns Ford declined to prosecute because Lori Pelzer paid the account.
Additionally, in 2002, Lori Pelzer and her brother, Xavier Troy Smith, defrauded their great-aunt, Lynn G. Yacoubian, by promising to invest Yacoubian's money in their real estate business, Home Assist Real Estate, LLC. Further, Xavier convinced Yacoubian to purchase distressed homes as investments. Instead, Xavier converted Yacoubian's money for his personal use, leaving Yacoubian with two defaulted mortgages. Yacoubian sued and was awarded a judgment against Home Assist Real Estate, LLC in the amount of $26,500.00, and a judgment against Xavier Troy Smith in the amount of $95,743.69! As of May 8, 2014, Xavier Troy Smith was a realtor with Crown Realty Professionals in Conyers, Georgia.
No Petition and Order of Reference to the Master-in-Equity, conferring jurisdiction upon the Master, as required by law, was filed after Judge Strickland’s Order of Dismissal without Prejudice was filed. Under South Carolina law, Rule 53, South Carolina Rules of Civil of Procedure, a Master-in-Equity has no authority and jurisdiction to adjudicate a matter, unless an Order of Reference has been filed by a Circuit Court Judge. Any orders issued by the master, without the Order of Reference first being filed, are void. Further, the master may be held personally liable for any resulting injury incurred by litigants.
Both Judge Strickland and Judge Barber should have known, had they reviewed the record, that they lacked jurisdiction to issue any orders in this case after February 16, 2006. [Judge Barber’s order, based on Judge Strickland’s order, is void.] Judge Barber’s term as Chief Administrative Judge expired on June 31, 2010.
In this case, Glen K. LaConey was assigned the judgment from Robert K. Freeland. LaConey proceeded to enforce the judgment.
On June 4, 2007, Lori Pelzer, Respondent above-named, was served through her counsel, Derwin T. Brannon, Esq., with the court’s order and Rule to Show Cause for Supplementary Proceedings, which included a restraining order against the transfer, interference with or disposal of Pelzer’s property pending further direction of the court. However, on June 7, 2007, Pelzer restructured Pelzer Premier Realty as Pelzer Premier Realty, LLC, thereby encumbering her partnership interests in the business.
On May 1, 2009, LaConey filed his motion for disqualification of Judge Strickland. Judge Strickland filed his Order of Recusal on May 5, 2009.
On April 22, 2010, LaConey filed his motion for supplementary proceedings which was delivered to Judge Cooper via certified mail, return receipt requested. The motion cited numerous incidents of fraud and violations of the Court’s restraining order by Pelzer. Judge Cooper disregarded the motion, failed to certify his familiarity with the record, failed to take any action, and failed to issue his final order disposing of the matter.
On June 25, 2010, Judge James R. Barber, III, Chief Administrative Judge for the Court of Common Pleas, filed his “Order“, without notice, without affording LaConey an opportunity to respond in a meaningful way, and without certifying his familiarity with the record, in which he ruled that “This Court has advised Mr. LaConey that it will not be scheduling Supplemental Proceedings, a function generally performed by the Master-in-Equity. Mr. LaConey may proceed with Supplemental Proceedings in the Pelzer case, but only through the appointment of a Special Referee.” Apparently, Judge Barber failed to review the record in the case in an effort to ignore the numerous affidavits filed by LaConey, which alleged that Judge Strickland had aided and abetted Lori Pelzer in hindering, delaying and defrauding LaConey in the execution of his judgments and had obstructed the administration of justice. Otherwise, Judge Barber would have known that he had previously assigned the matter to a circuit court judge; which is not that, “This Court has advised Mr. LaConey that it will not be scheduling Supplemental Proceedings”. Judge Barber lacked authority to issue final order in the matter, on the basis that Judge Cooper, not Judge Barber, was the assigned judge with authority to issue a final order.
Judge Barber persistently issued orders in these cases without jurisdiction, and without service upon LaConey. The offending orders were issued without notice, without affording LaConey an opportunity to respond in a meaningful way, and without Judge Barber’s certification of familiarity with the record.
On July 2, 2010, LaConey sent his letter, with attachments, to Judge Alison Renee Lee, Chief Administrative Judge for the Court of Common Pleas, advising Judge Lee of the status of these cases and seeking supplementary proceedings in aid of his judgments.
Judge Lee responded with her letter, dated July 15, 2010, in which she advised that she was in the process of reviewing the record in the case for any appropriate action, that LaConey was not listed as a party of record in the case, had requested the Clerk of Court to correct the record, and that she had requested all relevant materials pertaining to the case from Judge Strickland’s office.
On October 14, 2010, LaConey sent a letter to Judge Lee advising her that he is the sole caregiver of his gravely ill mother; and that he needs his money to make her comfortable in her final days; and that if his mother passes before these matters are resolved, due to the impropriety of the aforementioned judges, he would become Deeply disturbed! Judge Lee failed to respond. (LaConey's mother passed on April 6, 2015; the day after Easter and the day before his birthday.)
On December 21, 2010, LaConey sent his request and proposed Order of Reference for appointment of a Special Referee to Judge Lee via first-class mail. To date, Judge Lee has taken no action; thereby, further frustrating and impeding execution of LaConey‘s judgments.
(1) subjects another to arrest, detention, search, seizure, mistreatment, dispossession, assessment, lien, or other infringement of personal or property rights; or
(2) denies or impedes another in the exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power, or immunity.
(B) It is unlawful for a person falsely to assert authority of state law in connection with a sham legal process. "Sham legal process" means the issuance, display, delivery, distribution, reliance on as lawful authority, or other use of an instrument that is not lawfully issued, whether or not the instrument is produced for inspection or actually exists, which purports to:
(c) require or authorize the search, seizure, indictment, arrest, trial, or sentencing of a person or property.
State of South Carolina
County of Richland
Court of Common Pleas
In 2001, Lori Pelzer stole the identity of her great-aunt, Lynn G. Yacoubian, to acquire a Capital One credit card in the name of "Home Assist Real Estate, LLC", which Lori Pelzer used toward her beauty pageants, groceries, restaurants, haircuts, videos, cosmetic dentistry, and other personal sundries. Capital One declined to prosecute because Lori Pelzer paid the account.
In 2002, Lori Pelzer stole the identity of her great-aunt, Lynn G. Yacoubian, to acquire a 1992 Ford Excursion from Ronnie Burns Ford located in Chesnee, South Carolina. Ronnie Burns Ford declined to prosecute because Lori Pelzer paid the account.
Additionally, in 2002, Lori Pelzer and her brother, Xavier Troy Smith, defrauded their great-aunt, Lynn G. Yacoubian, by promising to invest Yacoubian's money in their real estate business, Home Assist Real Estate, LLC. Further, Xavier convinced Yacoubian to purchase distressed homes as investments. Instead, Xavier converted Yacoubian's money for his personal use, leaving Yacoubian with two defaulted mortgages. Yacoubian sued and was awarded a judgment against Home Assist Real Estate, LLC in the amount of $26,500.00, and a judgment against Xavier Troy Smith in the amount of $95,743.69! As of May 8, 2014, Xavier Troy Smith was a realtor with Crown Realty Professionals in Conyers, Georgia.
In the matter of Lamar Advertising of Columbia, Inc. v. Home Assist Real Estate, LLC, (Home Assist) JR# 247286, Lamar Advertising (Lamar), represented by counsel, attempted to enforce it’s judgment before Judge Joseph M. Strickland, Master-in-Equity (Judge Strickland).
During a hearing in early 2004, Judge Strickland ordered Lori Pelzer (Pelzer), officer of Home Assist, to make installment payments to Lamar, which Pelzer failed to pay. Judge Strickland issued his Order and Rule to Show Cause for Contempt against Pelzer. In response, Pelzer authored a letter to Judge Strickland, dated August 10, 2004, in which she stated that she was unable to comply with the court’s order because she and her husband were financially distressed, and that she closed Home Assist in June 2004, during the proceeding. Judge Strickland dismissed the matter without prejudice. (Lori Pelzer, her husband, Melvin K. Pelzer, and her brother, Xavier Troy Smith, were the managing members of Home Assist who looted the company of all of it's assets, leaving the company's creditors unpaid.)
During a hearing in early 2004, Judge Strickland ordered Lori Pelzer (Pelzer), officer of Home Assist, to make installment payments to Lamar, which Pelzer failed to pay. Judge Strickland issued his Order and Rule to Show Cause for Contempt against Pelzer. In response, Pelzer authored a letter to Judge Strickland, dated August 10, 2004, in which she stated that she was unable to comply with the court’s order because she and her husband were financially distressed, and that she closed Home Assist in June 2004, during the proceeding. Judge Strickland dismissed the matter without prejudice. (Lori Pelzer, her husband, Melvin K. Pelzer, and her brother, Xavier Troy Smith, were the managing members of Home Assist who looted the company of all of it's assets, leaving the company's creditors unpaid.)
On December 16, 2004, Lori Pelzer’s husband, Melvin K. Pelzer, purchased a homestead valued at $261,167.00 on 216 Chalfont Lane in Richland County, South Carolina, as reflected in Deed Book R-1008, page 1467 in the Richland County Register of Deeds Office; and on December 16, 2004, Melvin Pelzer obtained a home equity loan valued at $52,223.00, secured by the Chalfont Lane property, as reflected in Deed Book R-1012, page 2314.
Subsequently, Lori and Melvin opened Pelzer Premier Realty, a general partnership, in early 2005, after entry of the judgment below against Pelzer, and during the following case, which resulted in judgment in the amount of $26,500.00.
Glen K. LaConey, successor of Lynn G. Yacoubian, v. Home Assist Real Estate, LLC and Xavier Troy Smith, Judgment Roll No. 258732
In this case, Glen K. LaConey was assigned the default judgment from Lynn G. Yacoubian. LaConey proceeded to enforce the judgment against Home Assist.
In this case, Glen K. LaConey was assigned the default judgment from Lynn G. Yacoubian. LaConey proceeded to enforce the judgment against Home Assist.
On November 7, 2005, the Court issued LaConey’s proposed Order and Rule to Show Cause, directing Pelzer to appear as officer of Home Assist Real Estate, LLC, Respondent above-named, before Judge Strickland on December 7, 2005 for collection proceedings. Pelzer appeared and testified that the documents to be produced for examination were located at her attorney’s office. LaConey demanded to examine the documents in court for the record.
Judge Strickland ordered Pelzer to appear again on January 5, 2006 to produce the documents. Pelzer failed to appear, purportedly due to “surgery”. Amazingly, during a hearing on February 13, 2006, Judge Strickland refused to compel Pelzer to produce the documents as ordered, then he dismissed the matter without prejudice. Judge Strickland’s written Order of Dismissal Without Prejudice, was filed February 16, 2006. Pelzer filed Articles of Dissolution with the South Carolina Secretary of State for Home Assist on February 14, 2006. Lori Pelzer must be clairvoyant!
Amazingly, Judge Strickland, acting without jurisdiction and in his personal capacity, dismissed the matter with prejudice on January 7, 2008 without notice, without a hearing and without application by the parties. In his order with prejudice, Judge Strickland prevaricated that a hearing was held on July 16, 2007; however, no such hearing was held. Further, Judge Strickland omitted that he previously dismissed without prejudice. Thus, Judge Strickland denied LaConey due process of law and engaged in fraud on the court. Therefore, Judge Strickland’s Order of Dismissal With Prejudice is void. [LaConey learned of the Order with Prejudice incidental to his complaint against Judge Strickland with the Judicial Merit Selection Commission in November 2008.]
On April 5, 2010, LaConey filed his motion to vacate Judge Strickland’s Order of Dismissal with Prejudice as void. To date, the motion has not been heard. Thus, LaConey has been denied the right to petition the court for redress of his grievances.
On June 25, 2010, Judge James R. Barber, III, Chief Administrative Judge for the Court of Common Pleas, filed his “Order“, without notice, without affording LaConey an opportunity to respond in a meaningful way, and without certifying his familiarity with the record, in which he ruled that “Because the dismissal was never appealed, Judge Strickland’s ruling has become the law of the case.”. Judge Barber omitted that LaConey had sought relief from the judgment by his motion to vacate. Apparently, Judge Barber failed to review the record in an effort to ignore the numerous affidavits filed by LaConey alleging that Judge Strickland had aided and abetted Pelzer in hindering, delaying and defrauding LaConey in the execution of his judgment, and obstructed the administration of justice.
No Petition and Order of Reference to the Master-in-Equity, conferring jurisdiction upon the Master, as required by law, was filed after Judge Strickland’s Order of Dismissal without Prejudice was filed. Under South Carolina law, Rule 53, South Carolina Rules of Civil of Procedure, a Master-in-Equity has no authority and jurisdiction to adjudicate a matter, unless an Order of Reference has been filed by a Circuit Court Judge. Any orders issued by the master, without the Order of Reference first being filed, are void. Further, the master may be held personally liable for any resulting injury incurred by litigants.
Both Judge Strickland and Judge Barber should have known, had they reviewed the record, that they lacked jurisdiction to issue any orders in this case after February 16, 2006. [Judge Barber’s order, based on Judge Strickland’s order, is void.] Judge Barber’s term as Chief Administrative Judge expired on June 31, 2010.
On July 2, 2010, LaConey sent his letter, with attachments, to Judge Alison Renee Lee, Chief Administrative Judge for the Court of Common Pleas, advising Judge Lee of the status of the case and seeking supplementary proceedings in aid of judgment.
Judge Lee responded with her letter, dated July 15, 2010, in which she advised that she was in the process of reviewing the record in the case for any appropriate action, that LaConey was not listed as a party of record in the case, had requested the Clerk of Court to correct the record, and that she had requested all relevant materials pertaining to the case from Judge Strickland’s office. Judge Lee took no further action; thereby, frustrating and impeding execution of LaConey‘s judgment.
On June 3, 2011, LaConey filed his Motion for Supplementary Proceedings to enforce the judgment against Xavier Troy Smith. As expected, the court failed to respond, despite the fact that the clerk of court confirmed that LaConey's motion was in proper order as usual.
Glen K. LaConey, successor of Robert K. Freeland, v. Lori Pelzer, Judgment Roll No. 247572
On June 3, 2011, LaConey filed his Motion for Supplementary Proceedings to enforce the judgment against Xavier Troy Smith. As expected, the court failed to respond, despite the fact that the clerk of court confirmed that LaConey's motion was in proper order as usual.
Glen K. LaConey, successor of Robert K. Freeland, v. Lori Pelzer, Judgment Roll No. 247572
In this case, Glen K. LaConey was assigned the judgment from Robert K. Freeland. LaConey proceeded to enforce the judgment.
On June 4, 2007, Lori Pelzer, Respondent above-named, was served through her counsel, Derwin T. Brannon, Esq., with the court’s order and Rule to Show Cause for Supplementary Proceedings, which included a restraining order against the transfer, interference with or disposal of Pelzer’s property pending further direction of the court. However, on June 7, 2007, Pelzer restructured Pelzer Premier Realty as Pelzer Premier Realty, LLC, thereby encumbering her partnership interests in the business.
During collection proceedings before Judge Strickland on July 16, 2007, Pelzer yelled in open court, “I’m not paying Mr. LaConey a dime! I’m READY to go to jail! I’m READY to go to jail!”, after which Judge Strickland continued the matter without further action. [“July 16, 2007” was referenced in the above case.]
On July 16, 2008, Judge L. Casey Manning filed LaConey’s proposed Order and Rule to Show Cause for Supplementary Proceedings. The matter was not set for hearing.
On May 1, 2009, LaConey filed his motion for disqualification of Judge Strickland. Judge Strickland filed his Order of Recusal on May 5, 2009.
On August 6, 2009, Judge James R. Barber, III, Chief Administrative Judge for the Court of Common Pleas, filed LaConey’s proposed Order and Rule to Show Cause and set the matter for hearing before Judge G. Thomas Cooper, Jr. on September 23, 2009. Pelzer failed to appear. During the hearing, Judge Cooper directed LaConey to surrender the certified mail delivery receipt, evidencing service upon Pelzer, to Judge Cooper for filing. The delivery receipt has mysteriously disappeared.
On April 22, 2010, LaConey filed his motion for supplementary proceedings which was delivered to Judge Cooper via certified mail, return receipt requested. The motion cited numerous incidents of fraud and violations of the Court’s restraining order by Pelzer. Judge Cooper disregarded the motion, failed to certify his familiarity with the record, failed to take any action, and failed to issue his final order disposing of the matter.
On June 25, 2010, Judge James R. Barber, III, Chief Administrative Judge for the Court of Common Pleas, filed his “Order“, without notice, without affording LaConey an opportunity to respond in a meaningful way, and without certifying his familiarity with the record, in which he ruled that “This Court has advised Mr. LaConey that it will not be scheduling Supplemental Proceedings, a function generally performed by the Master-in-Equity. Mr. LaConey may proceed with Supplemental Proceedings in the Pelzer case, but only through the appointment of a Special Referee.” Apparently, Judge Barber failed to review the record in the case in an effort to ignore the numerous affidavits filed by LaConey, which alleged that Judge Strickland had aided and abetted Lori Pelzer in hindering, delaying and defrauding LaConey in the execution of his judgments and had obstructed the administration of justice. Otherwise, Judge Barber would have known that he had previously assigned the matter to a circuit court judge; which is not that, “This Court has advised Mr. LaConey that it will not be scheduling Supplemental Proceedings”. Judge Barber lacked authority to issue final order in the matter, on the basis that Judge Cooper, not Judge Barber, was the assigned judge with authority to issue a final order.
Judge Barber persistently issued orders in these cases without jurisdiction, and without service upon LaConey. The offending orders were issued without notice, without affording LaConey an opportunity to respond in a meaningful way, and without Judge Barber’s certification of familiarity with the record.
On July 2, 2010, LaConey sent his letter, with attachments, to Judge Alison Renee Lee, Chief Administrative Judge for the Court of Common Pleas, advising Judge Lee of the status of these cases and seeking supplementary proceedings in aid of his judgments.
Judge Lee responded with her letter, dated July 15, 2010, in which she advised that she was in the process of reviewing the record in the case for any appropriate action, that LaConey was not listed as a party of record in the case, had requested the Clerk of Court to correct the record, and that she had requested all relevant materials pertaining to the case from Judge Strickland’s office.
On October 14, 2010, LaConey sent a letter to Judge Lee advising her that he is the sole caregiver of his gravely ill mother; and that he needs his money to make her comfortable in her final days; and that if his mother passes before these matters are resolved, due to the impropriety of the aforementioned judges, he would become Deeply disturbed! Judge Lee failed to respond. (LaConey's mother passed on April 6, 2015; the day after Easter and the day before his birthday.)
On December 21, 2010, LaConey sent his request and proposed Order of Reference for appointment of a Special Referee to Judge Lee via first-class mail. To date, Judge Lee has taken no action; thereby, further frustrating and impeding execution of LaConey‘s judgments.
On April 1, 2011, LaConey filed his Motion for Disqualification of Judge Alison Renee Lee. To date, Judge Lee has taken no action, except to file a criminal complaint of Harassment against LaConey. (See "Illuminati in the Court", above.)
Mysteriously, on August 22, 2012, Judge James R. Barber, III finally filed his Order appointing Edward L. Grimsley, Esq. to act as Special Referee in this case. ( A Special Referee is an attorney appointed to serve as a judge in special cases.) Mr. Grimsley subsequently recused himself. Deborah B. Barbier, Esq. was appointed as substitute Special Referee and subsequently recused herself. LaConey did proceed to enforce the judgment against Xavier Troy Smith .
Mysteriously, on August 22, 2012, Judge James R. Barber, III finally filed his Order appointing Edward L. Grimsley, Esq. to act as Special Referee in this case. ( A Special Referee is an attorney appointed to serve as a judge in special cases.) Mr. Grimsley subsequently recused himself. Deborah B. Barbier, Esq. was appointed as substitute Special Referee and subsequently recused herself. LaConey did proceed to enforce the judgment against Xavier Troy Smith .
S.C. Code Ann. § 16-17-735, persons falsely asserting authority of law; offenses; punishment:
(A) A person acting or purporting to act in an official capacity or taking advantage of such actual or purported capacity commits a misdemeanor if, knowing that his conduct is illegal, he:
(1) subjects another to arrest, detention, search, seizure, mistreatment, dispossession, assessment, lien, or other infringement of personal or property rights; or
(2) denies or impedes another in the exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power, or immunity.
(B) It is unlawful for a person falsely to assert authority of state law in connection with a sham legal process. "Sham legal process" means the issuance, display, delivery, distribution, reliance on as lawful authority, or other use of an instrument that is not lawfully issued, whether or not the instrument is produced for inspection or actually exists, which purports to:
(a) be a summons, subpoena, judgment, lien, arrest
warrant, search warrant, or other order of a court of this State, a law
enforcement officer, or a legislative, executive, or administrative agency
established by state law;
(b) assert jurisdiction or authority over or determine or
adjudicate the legal or equitable status, rights, duties, powers, or privileges
of a person or property; or
(c) require or authorize the search, seizure, indictment, arrest, trial, or sentencing of a person or property.
(d) It is unlawful for a person to act without authority under state law as a Supreme Court Justice, a court of appeals judge, a circuit court judge, a master-in-equity, a family court judge, a probate court judge, a magistrate, a clerk of court or register of deeds, a commissioned notary public, or other authorized official in determining a controversy, adjudicating the rights or interests of others, or signing a document as though authorized by state law.
How long will these corrupt judges remain on the bench? Read Revelations 17 & 18.
Updates about Lori Pelzer!
Updates about Lori Pelzer!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)